This article is part of a series that highlights the gear the 200 top-ranked shooters in the Precision Rifle Series (PRS) are running in long-range rifle matches. (Learn about the Precision Rifle Series.) This group of competitors represents the best precision rifle shooters in the country.
My last article shared that almost 80% of these top shooters prefer to run a muzzle brake over a suppressor. It also covered the top 2 reasons most of the pros choose a brake, along with some new products that seem to offer some of the benefits of both suppressors and brakes.
This article will break down the specific brands and models of muzzle brakes that the pros are using. Also, this year, I asked each shooter if they were using a barrel tuner, and I’ll share all of that data towards the end of this article.
Best Muzzle Brake
Let’s dive into the data! We’ll start by looking at a breakdown of what brand of muzzle brake these top shooters are using:
On the chart above, the various colors represent where a shooter landed in terms of season rank in the PRS. For example, black indicates shooters who finished in the top 10, the darkest blue is people who finished 11-25, and the lighter the blue, the further out they finished in overall standings. The chart legend itemizes the ranks each color represents, but basically, the darker the color, the higher the shooter’s overall ranking.
ACE Muzzle Brake: 32% of Pros
The ACE Muzzle Brake has become the most popular brake among these top-ranked competitors – by a fairly wide margin. 1 in 3 chose to run the ACE brake overall, and 40% of those in the top 10.
ACE stands for Austin and Clay Enterprises (ACE). Austin Orgain and Clay Blackketter have won the PRS Season Championship in 3 of the past 5 years. They clearly know what it takes to be competitive at the highest levels!
Not long ago, I interviewed Austin Orgain, and here is what he told me about the ACE brake:
Now, if you want to strictly optimize for recoil reduction, the pure physics of ports that are angled back to the shooter are hard to beat, but that comes at a cost. And for me, that was that I would flinch. I started videoing myself, and I noticed that my eyes would close for a split second. Well, that recoil reduction was doing me no good. The recoil was reduced, but because my eyes closed for a split second, I still missed part of that bullet flight. With our brake, you don’t get near as much concussion back on the shooter, and I don’t have that finch and keep my eyes open through that first part of recoil. It’s a lot easier to pick up trace, and it’s a lot easier for your eyes to track that target in your scope through recoil and see where your bullet impacted on the target.
We also had the idea pretty early on that we wanted the brake to be ‘tuneable’ – not as in a barrel tuner, but to be able to tune out any lateral movement from recoil. So, there are index marks on the brake that allow you to turn the brake to offset any lateral recoil movement. Let’s say that you are shooting positional, and you notice that recoil is constantly moving you up and left. On most muzzle brakes, you can’t really do anything about that, but on ours, we have index lines and a set collar, and you can turn that brake so it is angled or tilted into the direction of the recoil. So if your rifle is recoiling left, you turn the brake to the left until it’s completely offset. Now, you don’t have two components of recoil happening. You’ll have a little bit of vertical movement but no horizontal movement to have to deal with. We figured the fewer planes you have of recoil, the easier it will be to spot your shot and track the target through recoil.
We tried a whole bunch of iterations and designs. We not only sat behind them and shot them, but we shot rifles with TriggerCams on them and did a lot of testing before we landed on what design was the best. We really like the end product and feel like it’s a great solution for what we wanted in a brake. So far, it seems to be a pretty popular product, and we’ve got a lot of positive feedback on it from shooters.”
Like many other designs on this list, the ACE brake features a self-timing lock nut (aka jam nut collar system), so the brake doesn’t have to be “timed” by a gunsmith for your particular barrel. That means the end user can easily switch it from one barrel to another. That is a valued feature by this crowd of shooters because most of them will burn through multiple barrels in a single year!
The street price of the ACE brake is $185 (at the time this was published).
American Precision Arms Muzzle Brake: 20% of Pros
The next most popular brand is American Precision Arms (APA), representing 20% of these pro shooters and 2 in the top 10.
APA has been one of the most used muzzle brakes among the top PRS shooters for several years. They also were one of the highest performers back when I did my muzzle brake field test, and since that time many other manufacturers have released similar designs – but APA continues to innovate.
APA has a couple of different brake models, so I asked these shooters which one they used. 90% of them said they opted for APA’s Fat B* muzzle brake, and 10% said they used the smaller APA Little B* muzzle brake. The Fat version is a little longer and features more side-ports for maximum recoil reduction.
APA’s Gen 3 design features tunable top ports that allow you to customize how much gas is directed upward to offset the muzzle rise of your rifle. The weight, balance, and overall recoil and gas pressure can vary from one rifle to another, so that allows you to tune it to the unique recoil profile of your rifle and ammo.
Street price on the APA Gen 3 Fat B* muzzle brake is typically around $150, but I noticed EuroOptic.com has them on sale right now for just $108 – making it one of the lowest-priced products used by a significant number of these top-level shooters.
Strike Without Warning Muzzle Brake: 14% of Pros
14% of these top competitors said they used a Strike Without Warning muzzle brake, including 1 in the top 10.
Strike Without Warning’s flagship design is their CHAD Tuner Muzzle Brake (TMB), which was released in 2020.
The CHAD brake is a unique design that is composed of six-piece stainless steel pieces that are CNC laser welded together into a single assembly. The manufacturer says, “Each piece has a tapered interface that aligns the assembly’s pieces perfectly, giving us industry-leading levels of run out. Due to its multi-piece design, we’re able to easily create geometry that’s otherwise impossible via conventional means. This means performance not previously seen before while maintaining shooter comfort. Designed with the use of our high-speed 50KHz impact sensor and SolidWorks flow simulations, we were able to design and refine the CHAD in ways the competition aren’t even aware of.”
The CHAD brake also features an integrated 24-position, adjustable, and locking harmonic barrel tuner.
The Strike Without Warning CHAD Tunable Muzzle Brake seems to have a lot of novel features, but they come at a cost because the Strike Without Warning CHAD TMB brake is 2-3 times more than any other brake on this list. It is priced at $515 for a raw stainless version or $545 for it finished in matte gold (aka Morgun King Edition).
Masterpiece Arms DN5 Muzzle Brake: 10% of Pros
10% of the pros were using the Masterpiece Arms DN5 Muzzle Brake, including 1 in the top 10. In fact, there were 6 using an MPA brake in the top 25, which made it the 2nd most popular brand among shooters in the top 25 (only behind the ACE brake).
MPA makes a few different models of muzzle brakes, but all of these shooters said they were using the DN5 brake.
The DN5 is extremely effective at reducing recoil. It is actually a derivative of the “Alamo Four Star Cowl Induction Brake” design that proved to have the best performance years ago in my muzzle brake field test.
You can see the DN5 ports are more narrow on top than the bottom, which means more gas is directed upward, which offsets muzzle rise and helps you stay on target through recoil so you can spot your impacts downrange. Several shooters have reported that the MPA DN5 brake helps them stay on target more than any other brake because of how much gas it ports up. I’ve heard one pro shooter who also shooter NRL Hunter competitions with a lightweight 6.5 PRC say it is especially useful in staying on target with lightweight magnum rifles.
Street price on MPA DN5 is $199.
MDT Muzzle Brake: 9% of Pros
9% of the pros were running an MDT muzzle brake, including 1 in the top 10.
The MDT Comp 4-Port muzzle brake is specifically designed for these types of high-performance competitions. The ports look similar to APA’s design, which is very effective at recoil reduction. However, MDT says this design is a little different in how it redirects gas:
“We began with two major design parameters, to redirect, or “break up” concussion towards the shooter, a standard pain-point in muzzle brake devices, and to reduce felt recoil as much as possible. Through 16 months of development, testing, optimizing, more testing, and then even more testing, we believe that we have created the most effective competition muzzle brake on the market.” – MDT
The MDT Comp brake also features an adjustable plate on top that you can slide to allow more or less gas to be vented upward to offset muzzle rise and help you stay on target.
Street price on the MDT Comp Muzzle Brake is $250, which makes it one of the most expensive options on this list.
Area 419 Muzzle Brakes: 8% of Pros
8% of these shooters use a muzzle brake from Area 419. However, none of those using an Area 419 brake were in the top 25, although there were 2 in the top 50.
The overwhelming majority were using the Area 419 Hellfire Match Self-Timing Muzzle Brake, but there was one shooter who said they were using the Area 419 Sidewinder Magnum Self-Timing Muzzle Brake. Both are very similar designs, but the Sidewinder is slightly larger.
From the outside, the design looks like a standard 4-port brake. But here is what Area 419 says: “This 4-port design isn’t simply stacking more of the same design on the end, it’s a complete redesign with each port being different. Different length ports, different angle ports, and different height port optimizes each one to provide an ideal function based on the pressure and volume of gas being acted on at its position. This results in optimal recoil management, optimal muzzle rise control, and imparts no extra sound pressure at the shooter position.”
Most brake designs have some type of self-timing or locking collar, but installation can be frustrating because it’s a guessing game on where you need to align the ports so that after you torque down the locking collar, they point in the correct direction. After when you tighten down a brake, it will twist a small amount. Area 419 emphatically claims to have solved that problem with their patent-pending design: “Extremely easy installation, brake WILL NOT turn as you torque the collar to lock. No more guessing where the brake ports will line up once you tighten it down!”
Area 419’s Hellfire Match brake sells for $195.
All Other Muzzle Brakes: 8% of Pros
92% of the shooters used one of the brands above, and the remaining 8% were spread over 8 different brands:
- Adaptive Tuning Systems (ATS) Tuner Brake: 2 Shooters (including #7 Jeff Guerry)
- Cortina Precision Tuner Brakes: 2 Shooters (#19 Derek Webster said he used the Cortina Precision PRS EC Tuner Brake, and #39 Justin Domaguin said he used the Cortina Precision NextGen EC Tuner Brake)
- Kahuna Muzzle Brake: 2 Shooters
- Salmon River Solutions Muzzle Brakes: 2 Shooters
- Billet Precision Rifles: 1 Shooter (including 1 in top 50)
- Insite Arms Muzzle Brake: 1 Shooter
- Brake made by “Muzzle Brakes and More”: 1 Shooter
- TorchWorks Muzzle Brake: 1 Shooter
Best Rifle Barrel Tuner
Barrel tuners have been around forever and have been very popular in the precision rimfire world, where shooters must use factory ammo and can’t “tune” a load for their rifles through reloading. But a few years ago Aaron Hipp, a veteran PRS pro shooter, introduced the Adaptive Tuning System (ATS) barrel tuner that was designed for centerfire rifles. The idea is the same as rimfire barrel tuners in that you attach a small weight at the muzzle that you can adjust in or out in very fine increments to optimize your barrel harmonics for a particular batch of ammo.
I asked these top-ranked PRS shooters if they used a barrel tuner, and here was their response to that question:
83% of these top-ranked shooters said they never use a barrel tuner. Among the top 10, 8 said no, 1 said sometimes, and 1 said yes. Among the top 25, 22 said they never use a tuner. So, the results are consistent through the ranks that 80-90% of those competing at the highest levels of the precision rifle game aren’t running a barrel tuner.
Some muzzle brakes, like those made by ATS or Cortina Precision, have an integrated tuner built into the brake. So, for some brands it’s obvious what kind of tuner they were using. However, ATS also makes a stand-alone barrel tuner that you can run alongside any muzzle brake or suppressor. So I reached out to the few shooters who said they were running a barrel tuner, and it wasn’t obvious which one it was. I got responses from all but 2 shooters. Here are the results for what brand of tuner the people who said they were using one ran:
Note: The ones that are “Unknown” are the 2 shooters that I never got a response from and couldn’t tell from their muzzle brake exactly what brand of tuner they might have been using. On next year’s survey I’ll try to ask those using a barrel tuner what model they run explicitly to prevent this going forward.
Here are links for more info on the tuners these companies offer:
- Strike Without Warning Tunable Brake “Morgun King Edition” (I provided more detail on this brake earlier in this article)
- ATS XL Competition Tuner (At least 2 shooters explicitly said they were using this as their tuner, and it is the model you can run any muzzle brake or suppressor alongside.)
- ATS Muzzle Brake with Integrated Tuner
- APA Fat Tuna (replaces the jam nut on the APA Fat B* brake)
- Cortina Precision NextGen EC Tuner Brake
- Cortina Precision PRS EC Tuner Brake
I’ll also mention that Bryan Litz and the Applied Ballistics team did the most in-depth research on barrel tuners I’ve ever seen, and the results are published in Modern Advancements in Long Range Shooting Vol III. If you like my style of writing and testing, I guarantee you’ll enjoy that book!
Coming Up Next
The next articles will cover the specific brands and models of suppressors that these top-tier competitors are using. So stay tuned for those results!
If you enjoyed this content, there is more to come! Over the next few months, I’ll be publishing a ton of data on what the top precision rifle shooters are using. Check out the other “What The Pros Use” articles that have already been published.
Be the first to know when the next What The Pros Use article is published by signing up for email alerts.
If you’d like to help PRB, here are ways you could do that:
Donate to PRB
No pressure – but it does cost quite a bit to support the amount of traffic PRB gets, and I spend quite a bit of time creating all this content. If you get value from the content and would like to donate, I promise 100% of it will go towards keeping this thing going!
Share on Facebook & Your Favorite Forum!
It would help me out if you’d share a link to this article on Facebook and your favorite rifle forums so more people can benefit from the content.
Cal. Really appreciate your well researched articles, analysis and insights. Thank you. Question-will you be doing an upcoming article on brass?
Best-Mark
Hey, Mark. Yes, I do plan to do a post on what brass these guys are using. It looks like I haven’t published anything on that in quite a while. In fact, I don’t even think Alpha Munitions was in business the last time I published a comprehensive comparison on what brands these top shooters are running. I’d expect things have changed a lot on that front over the last few years, so I actually look forward to seeing the trends myself! Maybe I’ll even jump that one forward a little in the order that I originally had planned, because you’ve peaked my interest! 😉
Thanks,
Cal
Cal, It seems the experts have spoken, maximum recoil reduction may be less important than minimal concussion. Since so many shooters are shooting the ACE, it would probably be useful to know how the ACE stacks up in the recoil reduction and noise measurements that you made on all those other brakes.
Hey, Dean. I agree! I’d like to know myself. However, after I did my original muzzle brake test, I was pretty much overrun by people trying to send me their muzzle brake to test or asking if I could help them on a consulting basis in their product development. Ultimately, I do all this in my spare time and have a full-time job that I love. So I ended up selling all of my test equipment to a larger manufacturers so they could use it in their ongoing R&D. So unfortunately, I don’t have any of that equipment any more to do those comparisons.
The sound meter I used was actually a high-end commercial device that the guys at Thunder Beast brought down to help me out, and I think that thing cost over $10,000! It turns out measuring how loud a brake or suppressor is can be a very advanced science … that is easy to get wrong without that kind of high-end commercial equipment. When I see people using their iPhones to measure how loud a suppressor or brake is, it always makes me chuckle a little. I wish it was that simple, but its not.
So, I’m with you, Dean. But, it’s not as simple as me whipping out the test equipment one afternoon. Sorry, man!
Thanks,
Cal
Cal , do you have any details on your original test equient, I’m looking to do some similar testing on ar buffer and recoil.
You are in luck, Chris! I have all the details on the original test equipment, for just such an occasion! To be honest, I’ve had two of the largest US rifle manufacturers reach out to me and they built identical recoil test systems to use for their internal research & development. About 8-12 months later, I noticed one of those companies came out with a new muzzle brake design that was a massive improvement over the factory design they’d been offering on their rifles for literally over a decade. That was pretty rewarding for me to see! Before that they were just trying stuff and taking it out to shoot to see how “it felt.” That’s what most people were doing. I know several started using a more data-driven approach after my muzzle brake test, which was honestly a big part of my motivation behind doing the project. I was hoping that would be the outcome, and in the end … it just means I’d have more great products to pick from for my personal rifles! 😉
I actually itemized every single part of my test equipment, including exact manufacturers and model numbers in this article: Muzzle Brakes: Recoil Primer, Test Equipment & Rifles. I even included the CAD drawings with all the dimensions for the custom test fixture I built myself, and the custom “butt holster” I made.
Here is a quick image of all the parts, but you can find more details in that article:
I ended up selling all of my test equipment to a different manufacturer, but I’ve thought about rebuilding it a few times. I’m not sure I’d change a thing about the setup. It seemed pretty ideal for what I was using it for. It’s fairly low-level stuff, but I’m pretty sure I could export the results from the sensor to a CSV file … which you could open in Excel and analyze there without getting too fancy. I will say I have a heavy computer science background, but none of it seemed too tricky to me.
Best of luck to you, Chris!
Thanks,
Cal
Looking forward to the WTPU Suppressor article, and thoughts, experience, and especially testing of ‘post-suppressor’ brakes.
Hey, Dan! You are in luck! This one took a while to write, because I noticed so many interesting trends related to suppressors since the last time I published info on them a few years ago. I also had to reach out to a dozen of the shooters to clarify or gather a little more info on what specific models they were running, which added time.
Hopefully it was worth the wait! Best Suppressor – What The Pros Use
Unfortunately, I don’t have any testing data on “post-suppressor” brakes … but I will tell you that I’ve personally bought several suppressors lately, so I could try them out for myself. Here is what I have already ordered and am currently waiting for: Area 419 Maverick, Thunder Beast Magnus-K, Thunder Beast Magnus-K-RR (the one with the brake on the end), and a SilencerCo Scythe-Ti. I obviously feel like the trend towards a hybrid suppressor/brake has some merit, although I’ll admit I haven’t shot any of those suppressors before. It will probably still be 4-8 months before I get my hands on all of them with the ATF lead time for stamps going to a trust. But, one days I’ll have them and can share my experience. Until then, I bet you can gain a little insight from what the guys are using in that article.
Thanks,
Cal
Have you ever attempted to try any muzzle brakes from Ultradyne? Here’s a link to the brand’s page of muzzle brakes I’ve found: https://ultradyneusa.com/product-category/all-products/muzzle-brakes/
I haven’t tried them, but at first glance they look like they’d be effective. The ports are angled back toward the shooter, which means they probably optimize the amount of work the brake can do in terms of reducing recoil – but that will be at the expense of concussion. There is no free lunch! It also looks like they have several upward facing ports to help offset muzzle rise. I’ve looked at a ton of muzzle brake designs and also performed the most in-depth independent tests I’ve ever seen or heard of … and I’d say it looks like a solid design.
If you are using a large cartridge, it might be a great choice. I’d say if you are using a smaller cartridge like a 6 BR or 6 Dasher, it might be overkill or expose you to more concussion than would be necessary to keep you on target. So it kind of just depends on the application in terms of which design might be best for you.
Thanks,
Cal