A Data-Driven Approach To Precision Rifles, Optics & Gear
Home / Ammo & Handloading / Remington 223 Brass Weight Variation

Remington 223 Brass Weight Variation

I recently weighed 153 pieces of once-fired Remington 223 brass that had all been full-length resized, trimmed to length, deburred, primer pockets uniformed, and neck turned.  Here is the resulting data:

  • Average = 90.8 grains
  • Standard Deviation = 0.71 grains
  • Average Deviation = 0.53 grains (average of the absolute deviations of the data points from the mean … 0.53gr actually isn’t that bad)
  • Variance = 0.51
  • Extreme Spread = 4.0 grains
  • Extreme Spread as % of total weight = 4% (this is significant)

Remington 223 Brass Weight Distribution

All data was gathered using a RCBS ChargeMaster 1500 Powder Scale, which is accurate to +- 1/10 grain and was calibrated immediately prior to use.

For match grade ammo, I only use brass that is within 1% of each other in terms of weight.  In this example 0.9 grains is roughly equivalent to 1% of the total weight (90.8/100 = 0.908).  So for this distribution, I gathered all pieces that weighed between 90.2 and 91.1 and called them my “match brass”.  I culled the brass on the extreme ends and will use them to setup my neck turning equipment, but probably won’t ever load them.  I split the remaining brass into two groups: under 90.2 and over 91.1.  It will be loaded for practice rounds or “foulers” … just not for matches.

I’ve found a very useful method to sort brass as you are weighing it.  I use a plastic eggcrate louver (typically used to diffuse light and protect flourescent bulbs in commercial applications).  I bought it from Lowes for a few dollars, and it works like a champ.  I just put all of the brass that weighs the same (to 1/10 of the grain) in the same column.  An added benefit is it pretty much makes a physical distribution chart for you when you are done.

For more info on weighing brass, check out this helpful blog post from Sinclair.

About Cal

Cal Zant is the shooter/author behind PrecisionRifleBlog.com. Cal is a life-long learner, and loves to help others get into this sport he's so passionate about. His engineering background, unique data-driven approach, and ability to present technical and complex information in a unbiased and straight-forward fashion has quickly caught the attention of the industry. For more info on Cal, check out PrecisionRifleBlog.com/About.

Check Also

Bullet Jump Load Development

Bullet Jump: Is Less Always Better?

This landmark article shares new, primary research that Mark Gordon from Short Action Customs has compiled over the past 2 years. He tested a wide range of bullet jumps in several rifle/load configurations, and this post shares the analysis of that data. Mark used a similar approach to the Audette Ladder Test and OCW method, but the goal was to not find the most forgiving powder charge weight, but the most forgiving bullet jump. He wasn’t looking for the specific bullet jump that grouped the best, but the largest window of bullet jumps that provided a similar point of impact. That means the rifle would be more consistent from the start of the match to the end of it or could shoot a particular kind of match-grade factory ammo really well for a longer period of time. Mark’s findings may seem counter to conventional wisdom when it comes to bullet jump, but a few national-level precision rifle competitors also support the idea, which I highlight in this post as well.